SOS Venezuela: The Cruelty of Some, and the Indifference of Many

SOS Venezuela: The Cruelty of Some, and the Indifference of Many / Juan
Juan Almeida
Posted on March 17, 2014

A year after his death, it would be unjust to deny that the ex-president
Hugo Chávez had the ability to be a leader, and a most convincing
negotiating weapon: oil.

Supported by this, and with the Cuban government as co-conspirators, he
was able to put together a kind of Latin American integration, which
turned into a monolithic, geopolitical and economic bloc, whose
principal role was, and continues to be, to assist him in the regional
context.

The cost of all this expansion, was national division. Partition which
he master-minded using his well-known ability to confront internal
problems with arrogant creativity and the power to manage people.

After he died, Maduro's big objective, as successor, was to reunify the
nation; but it's a difficult job, Venezuela has turned into an apparent
democracy within one of the most unequal societies in America, with the
added twist of having lost all sense of tolerance.

The time bomb exploded. The official forces repressed, and the young
people were not afraid. Venezuela is splitting again, and expresses it
in demonstrations, many against and a good many others in favour of
Nicolás Maduro's government.

The country's situation is critical, and it is shameful to see how some
social network pyromaniacs and followers and "likers", making out to be
heroic "patriots", try to avoid dialogue and with total irresponsibility
(from the comfort of their homes), with a coca-cola in hand, encourage
confrontation, as if the followers of Twitter and Facebook were more
important than the victims of the conflict.

I believe the prospects for the Venezuelans are predictable, and I can't
imagine that there will be–in the very short term–a national move back
toward democracy. All the more so following the delayed and timid OEA
(Organisation of American States) resolution adopted by a 29-3 vote, and
not a consensus, because, as expected, the ALBA bloc countries and
CARICOM had a majority and opposed the adoption of a stronger and more
effective resolution.

Thanks to the sophistries of the then president Hugo Chávez, with the
benefit of advice direct from Havana, the senior secretary general of
the OEA, José Miguel Insulsa, without detracting from his demonstrated
experience in affairs of state, lost part of his leadership within the
organisation he presides over.

It has become evident that the OEA has structural problems, that it
needs an overall review, has ceased to be an entity for valid dialogue
for this hemisphere, and today is simply the governments of Caracas and
Havana, which, without belonging to it (Cuba was suspended until 2009)
and, like María Ramos' kitty [a Cuban prostitute's cat, which she blamed
for the death of her pimp], have a majority of votes among the member
states of this organisation.

Insulsa, as an additional post-diplomacy move, should ask, even if his
request is rejected, to visit Venezuela to see personally on the spot
what the situation is and in that way be able to avoid the different
very biased versions of what happened put forward by one side or the other.

In this crucial moment, the important thing is not the cruelty of some,
but the indifference of many. Politics is very serious, and we are all
responsible, and cannot just leave it up to the politicians.

Translated by GH

11 March 2014

http://translatingcuba.com/sos-venezuela-the-cruelty-of-some-and-the-indifference-of-many-juan-juan-almeida/